When we speak out...
Why We Are Losing the Vaccine War,
and what to do about it
Part 2
(Part 1)
Last Updated Jan 29, 2019
When we speak out, we risk attack. When we remain silent, we guarantee it...
Vaccine Rights Alan Phillips, J.D.
Or,
as a radio listener-caller on "The Know Your Rights Hour" in 2014 put
it: "If you're afraid to speak out now, you should be more afraid not to speak out, as it will only get harder later on..."
The solution to the vaccine agenda is a 3 step process:
1)
Expose the corruption, as the legal systems (courts, legislatures) will
not function reliably until that occurs (for even a bad person will do
the right thing if there's a spotlight on 'em), and the solution
requires enacting laws that protect and having courts willing to
enforce those laws (by way of the real science finally seeing the light
of day, of course);
2) Exposing the corruption requires neutralizing the PSYOP (psychological control tactics), as otherwise, no one will see the corruption for what it is, or see the real science; and
3)
Neutralizing the PSYOP requires (among other things) large numbers of
people speaking out in a coherent, unified voice, calling out the
corruption (as otherwise, we are easily marginalized, portrayed as a
small number of quacks, etc.).
Until
enough people speak out, the vaccine agenda progresses. As the
foundation is now being systematically laid, via extreme rhetoric, for
the enactment of laws prohibiting public sharing of anti-vaccine views
in the name of "public health," remaining silent is no longer an
option. Doing so only postpones the day when the corruption is exposed,
and the ongoing harm is finally arrested. We control the ultimate
price, the totality of harm caused, by our silence or our voices.
The bottom line our community MUST come to terms with is:
EACH OF US MUST PUT OURSELVES AT RISK TO ACHIEVE OUR GOAL.*
Risk-taking is not an option, it is a requirment.
And we must speak out now for the sake of newborns, toddlers, children,
and (increasingly now) adults. If remaining silent buys one person or
family some time, it contributes to the taking away of time away from
millions of others. We can no longer afford to put ourselves above
others. This message needs to spread throughout our entire
community. No one else is going to save us; we must all save all of us.
Paradoxically,
speaking out raises the risk to the individual speaker, while lowering
the risk to those already speaking out. But with each new person who
speaks out, others are emboldened to do the same. The more who speak
out, then, the safer it becomes for all who speak out, and the less
risk to others for first speaking out. We must add to speaking-out
numbers until our collective voices drown out the psyop lies.
Put another way, we must covert growing awareness numbers to growing outspoken voices.
Millions
of people already question mandatory immunization. What would be the
effect of only one million of them speaking out on the same day?
Especially if focused on the same point(s)?
What
if we declared the 1st day of each month to be "International Vaccine
Truth-Telling Day," a day for **everyone** to speak out together, for
both the immense impact and safety in numbers? What if the first
collective message was simply, "The U.S. VICP has paid out $4 billion
for vaccine injuries and deaths!"? How many who never heard of this
might have their reality-fantasy cracked just a little?
*Everyone must
make a decision for themselves and their families, of course, and
there's' no judgment here for any particular decision.
|
|
