"[The hospital] did
finally accept my letter from you . . .
and I get to keep my job,
without getting the vaccine.
Thank you again for your help with this!"
HG,
December 2009
|
|
STATE EXEMPTION LAWS
Some states have vaccine
requirements and exemptions for healthcare workers. A few
have medical exemptions; a couple have religious and one philosophical
exemptions. The
CDC posts this information here. |
TITLE VII and the EEOC
Title VII of the 1964 federal Civil
Rights Act requires qualifying employers to reasonably accommodate
their employees' religious beliefs. Widespread hospital policies
allowing religious exemptions support the contention that
healthcare facilities can reasonably accommodate employees' religious
objections to immunizations, generally. The EEOC (Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission), a federal agency that enforces discrimination
laws and investigates employer discrimination complaints, also supports
healthcare workers' right to
refuse vaccines in the workplace. However, while most hospitals have
policies
allowing employees to refuse vaccines for religious reasons, some
are overreaching, requiring support from a religious leader.
These policies, arguably, exceed the employer's legal
authority, so those in this situation may need the help of an attorney
to cite applicable law to convince the hospital that they are
overstepping their legal boundaries.
Most hospital employees who attempt an exemption on
their own are turned down. It can be critical, therefore, when
requesting a religious exemption to vaccines in the workplace, to have
your statement of religious beliefs reviewed by an experienced attorney
beforehand, to avoid the legal pitfalls that have caused most employees
to be turned down. Unfortunately, this is a legal arena that does not
follow "common sense" thinking, so what most people say includes things
that can undermine the exemption right. This is especially true when
most hospitals also overstep their legal boundaries. Bottom line, it
can be very difficult to fix a flawed religious exemption statement
after it has already been submitted.

|
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
RESTORATION ACTS
The federal government and about a
dozen states
have a Religious Freedom Restoration Act
or equivalent legislation that requires government to use the least
restrictive means to achieve a compelling state interest when
imposing on the free exercise of religious beliefs. While current
thinking would consider vaccines to be a "compelling state interest",
the "least restrictive
means" would arguably not require that everyone be immunized, and may
provide a basis for vaccine religious exemptions where these acts apply.

|
CONTRACTS
In 2005, the Washington State Nurses
Association won a federal court case against a hospital's mandatory flu
shots for nurses. The court held that the hospital's unilateral
imposition of flu shots
violated the nurse's union's collective bargaining agreement, which
required
the hospital to bargain collectively with the union over all terms and
conditions of employment. The case was confirmed on appeal to the 9th
Circuit in 2007. See VA Mason Hosp. v. WA State Nurses
Assn., 511 F.3d 908 (2007).
One weakness in the hospital's position
was the lack of public policy favoring mandatory flu shots. However,
since the alleged 2009-2010 pandemic (which was not a real pandemic at all), hospitals
around the country have been
implementing seasonal and swine flu vaccine mandates for
employees that risks changing policy in a way that could affect this
argument in future cases.
|
OTHER FACTORS
WORKPLACE VACCINE INJURIES AND DEATHS: WHO PAYS? All
vaccines carry a risk of
injury or death. If a hospital employee is injured by a flu vaccine,
who is liable? Is this a workman's compensation matter? Swine flu
vaccine manufacturers are exempt from liability, and swine flu vaccines
are not listed as being compensable under the federal Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VCIP). These are issues to raise with employers
who mandate flu and swine flu vaccines.
DO
FLU SHOTS WORK?
See The Truth About the Flu Shot
by Dr. Sheri Tennpenny citing studies that document flu vaccine
failure. See also information about the 1976 swine flu vaccine
fiasco--e.g.,
Haber P, Sejvar J, Mikaeloff Y, Destefano F, [2009]. "Vaccines and
guillain barrè-syndrome". Drug Saf 32 [4]:
309–23..
doi:10.2165/00002018-200932040-00005 [inactive 2009-04-26]. PMID
19388722; and the history of
reported and compensated flu vaccine
injury and
deaths (e.g., see NVICP Statistics Reports).
Finally, Dr. Hugh
Fudenberg, MD, a world leading immunogeneticist, found
that 5 consecutive annual flu shots increased Alzheimer's rates by a
factor of 10 compared to 2, 1,
or no shots.
WILL FORCED EMPLOYEE FLU SHOTS AFFECT EMPLOYEE MORALE? As
many as
1/2 of
healthcare
workers say they don't want flu vaccines. Therefore, vaccine mandates
could have a significant impact on employee morale, a particularly bad
thing in any patient-care setting! Here are just a few of the many 2009
articles showing opposition to swine flu vaccines from healthcare
professionals:
- H1N1 is a False Pandemic, Health
Expert Claims
Fox News, January 11,
2010
- European Parliament to Investigate
WHO and "Pandemic" Scandal
Center
for Research on Globalization, January 2,
2010
- Algiers Doctors advise not to
vaccinate against influenza A(H1N1)
Ennahar Online, December 31, 2009
- American doctors saying 'no' to swine
flu vaccine
Washington
Post, November 8,
2009
- Many Italian physicians reject swine
flu vaccine
presstv.ir, November 7,
2009
- GP's and practice staff on front line
turn down swine flu vaccine
pulsetoday.co.uk, November 4,
2009
- Dutch scientists suggest kids better
off without flu shots
POB News, October
29, 2009
- Local pediatricians against H1N1
vaccine
Wink News (FL), October
27, 2009
- 65% of French Nurses Will Refuse
"Swine Flu" Vaccine Over Safety Concerns
Health Freedom Alliance,
September 24, 2009
- Half of Healthcare Workers Will
LIkely Refuse H1N1 Vaccine, Research Finds
FOXNews.com, August 26k, 2009
- A third of [UK] nurses will refuse to
have the swine flu jab
MailOnline, August 18, 2009
- Medical journal urges caution over
flu vaccine
IRISHTIMES.com, August 1, 2009
- New York State Nurses Association
Objects to Flu Vaccine Manadate for Nurses
Testimony
by NYSNA
Accociate Director, July 23, 2009
|
College
Students in Healthcare Curriculums: Clincal Work in Local Hospitals
College students doing clinical work in hospitals and other local
heathcare facilities are being told that they are required to get
shots, in addition to those required by state law for all college
students. These additional shots are required by the hospital or other
institution, and may not be covered by state exemption laws. However,
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act makes it unlawful for employers
"controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining" to
discriminate against individuals based on religion and other factors,
so students in healthcare curriculums have a federal right to refuse
vaccines in their clinical work, for religious reasons, and if denied
that right, may file an EEOC
complaint alleging discrimination. However, since most who attempt this exemption on their
own are turned down, it can be
critical to have your statement of religious beliefs reviewed
by an experienced attorney beforehand, to avoid the legal pitfalls.
Unfortunately, this is a
legal arena that does not follow "common sense" thinking, so what most
people say includes things that can undermine the exemption right. This
is especially true when most hospitals seem not to know their proper
legal boundaries, and therefore will err on the side of refusing
exemption requests. It can be very difficult to fix a flawed
religious exemption statement after it has already been submitted, so
getting proper advice in advance is strongly advised.
Arguably,
hospitals, for purposes of students doing clinical work, could be
considered an
extension of the college classroom and thus subject to the same state
exemption laws that the colleges themselves are subject to. Colleges
may argue that the vaccines are required by hospital policy, and
not state
law, and therefore, state exemption laws that apply to the college or
university don't apply. The schools may also argue that they are
contractually
bound to provide vaccinated students,
and students may be unwittingly contractually obligated to comply with
all
program requirements including vaccination. But these are state law
arguments, so in any event, Title VII would "win", since federal law
generally supersedes state law when the two are in conflict. This is
because federal law is the higher legal authority.
Medical exemptions are probably acknowledged, but what
qualifies is subject to debate, and schools are likely to apply strict
standards.
While Title VII provides a strong legal argument, it does not address
vaccines specifically. Therefore, the better long-term solution is to
become legislatively active. We need to
convince state legislators to enact laws giving all persons,
including students, the right
to refuse vaccines when doing clinical work in local hospitals.
Presently, few states have statutory exemption laws for healthcare
employees, and probably none have laws for students doing clinical work
in local hospitals as part of their college curriculum.
|
|